MISCON ELECTRICITY ARTICLES NEW STUFF GOOD STUFF

What Is "Electricity"?
©1996 William J. Beaty
Electrical Engineer

SEE ALSO:
  • Scroll down: list of definitions
  • Scientific definition of Electricity
  • Famous scientists' quotations
  • Electricity is not Energy
  • What is electricity, REALLY?!
  • All articles here
  • What is electricity? This question is impossible to answer because the word "Electricity" has several contradictory meanings. These different meanings are incompatible, and the contradictions confuse everyone. If you don't understand electricity, you're not alone. Even teachers, engineers, and scientists have a hard time grasping the concept.

    Obviously "electricity" cannot be several different things at the same time. Unfortunately we've defined the word Electricity in a crazy way. Because the word lacks one distinct meaning, we can never pin down the nature of electricity. In the end we're forced to declare that there's no such stuff as "electricity" at all! Here's a quick example to illustrate the problem.

    Do generators make electricity? To answer this question, consider the household light bulb. Inside a lamp cord the charges (the electrons) sit in one place and wiggle back and forth. That's AC or alternating current. At the same time, the waves of electromagnetic field move rapidly forward. This wave-energy does not wiggle, instead it races along the wires as it flows from the distant generators and into the light bulb. OK, now ask yourself this: when "electricity" is flowing, is it called an Electric Current? Yes? If so, then "electricity" is simply the charges already inside the wires, where a flow of electricity is a flow of charge. And therefore we must say that the "electricity" sits inside the wires and vibrates back and forth. Generators do not create any, and electricity does not flow forward through the wires. Next, ask yourself if electricity is a form of energy. If it's energy, then electricity is not the movable charges. Instead, electricity is made of invisible electromagnetic fields, and it doesn't wiggle back and forth within the AC cables. Instead it can only exist in the space outside the wires, and not within the metal. Generators do create electricity, and it races along the wires at high speed. Yet please note that Electricity cannot do both, it cannot be both the charges and the fields, the electrons and the energy. So which one is really "the electricity?" Is it the wiggling electrons within the wires? Or is it the high-speed EM field energy? The experts unfortunately cannot agree on a narrow definition. The reference books give conflicting answers, so there *is* no answer.
    If someone asks whether generators make electricity, it exposes a great flaw in the way we talk about "electricity". If we can repair this flaw, perhaps our explanations will finally make sense.

    Below are the five most common meanings of the word Electricity. Which one do you think is right? Think about this carefully, because if one of these meanings is correct, all the others must be wrong! After all, no "science term" must ever possess several conflicting definitions. Unfortunately our dictionaries and encyclopedias contain all of these contradictions. (Click the links to find out more about each.)


    The word "Electricity:" common definitions

    1. The scientist's definition: "Electricity" means only one thing: quantities of electricity are measured in Coulombs, so "electricity" is the electrons and protons themselves; it is the electric charge inside metals. All wires contain electricity all the time, that's why they're conductors.
    Examples: CURRENT OF ELECTRICITY. QUANTITY OF ELECTRICITY. COULOMBS OF ELECTRICITY.
    2. The everyday definition: "Electricity" means only one thing: the electromagnetic field energy sent out by batteries and generators.
    Examples: PRICE OF ELECTRICITY. KILOWATT-HOURS OF ELECTRICITY.
    3. The grade-school definition: "Electricity" means only one thing: it refers to the flow of electrons, the flowing motion of electric charge. When they stop flowing, the electricity disappears.
    Examples: "CURRENT" ELECTRICITY. AMPERES OF ELECTRICITY.
    4. "Electricity" means only one thing: it refers to the amount of imbalance between quantities of electrons and protons.
    Example: "STATIC" ELECTRICITY. DISCHARGE OF ELECTRICITY.
    5. "Electricity" is nothing other than the classes of phenomena involving electric charges.
    Examples: BIOELECTRICITY, PIEZOELECTRICITY, TRIBOELECTRICITY, THERMOELECTRICITY, ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRICITY ...ETC.
    6. Other less common definitions:
    "Electricity" refers to the flowing motion of electrical energy (electric power, Watts of electricity)
    "Electricity" really means the electric potential or e-field (Volts of electricity)
    "Electricity" only means the glowing nitrogen/oxygen plasma (sparks of electricity)
    "Electricity" is nothing but a field of science (Basic Electricity, Advanced Electricity)


    ELECTRICITY, n.
    The power that causes all natural phenomena not known to be caused by something else.
    <grin!>
    (Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary, 1911)


    If we wish to agree on a single correct definition of "electricity," which definition should we choose? The Scientific version, number one above? But that would mean that all of our books are wrong, since books insist that electricity is the energy, or that electricity is the motion of charges: the current. Except for the CRC Handbook and the NIST SI physics standards, the few textbooks which do use the scientific definition are all seventy years old, or older.

    Well, maybe we don't need to choose just one definition. Could we mix them? Could we let Electricity be an "elastic term?" Suppose we ignore all these contradictions and instead pretend that all of the above definitions are true. Below is the "clear" and "simple" description of electricity which results:

    Electricity is quite simple: "electricity" is just the flowing motion of electricity! Electricity is a mysterious incomprehensible entity which is invisible and visible, both at the same time. Also, electricity is both a form of energy and a type of matter. Both. Electricity is a kind of low-frequency radio wave which is made of protons. It's a mysterious force which cannot be seen, and yet it looks like blue-white fire that arcs across the clouds. It moves forward at the speed of light... yet it sits and vibrates inside your AC cord without flowing forwards at all. It's totally weightless, yet it has a small weight. When electricity flows through a light bulb's filament, it gets changed entirely into light. Yet not one bit of electricity is ever used up by the light bulb, and all the electricity flows out of the filament and back down the other wire. College textbooks are full of electricity, yet they have no electric charge! Electricity is like sound waves, no no, it's just like wind, no, the electricity is like the air molecules. Electricity is like cars on a highway, no, the electricity is the speed of the cars, no, electricity is just like "traffic waves." Electricity is a class of phenomena ...a class of phenomena which can be stored in batteries! If you want to measure a quantity of electricity, what units should you use? Why Volts of electricity, of course. And also Coulombs of electricity. And Amperes of electricity. Watts of electricity and Joules, all at the same time. Yet "electricity" is definitely a class of phenomena; merely a type of event. Since we can't have an amount of an event, we can't really measure the quantity of electricity at all... right? Right?
    Heh heh.
    Does my description above sound stupid and impossible? You're right. It is. The word "electricity" has contradictory meanings, and I'm trying to show what happens when we accept more than one meaning. Electricity is not both slow and fast at the same time. It is not both visible and invisible. And electricity isn't the flowing motion ...of electricity.

    Instead, approximately ten separate things have the name "electricity." There's no single stuff called "electricity." electricity does not exist. Franklin, Edison, Thompson, and millions of science teachers should've had a long talk with Mrs. McCave before they decided to give one single name to a large variety of independent science concepts.

    Mrs. McCave was invented by Dr. Seuss. She had twenty three sons. She named them all "Dave."

    Whenever we ask "What Is Electricity," that's just like asking Mrs. McCave "who is dave?" How can she describe her son? There can be no answer since the question itself is wrong. It's wrong to ask "who is Dave?" because we're silently assuming that there's only one Dave, when actually there are many different people. They all just happen to be named Dave. Who is Dave? Mrs. McCave cannot answer us until she first corrects our misunderstanding. Dave doesn't exist. She wishes she'd given them all separate names.

    For the same reason, we'll never find a simple answer to the question "what is electricity?" because the question itself is wrong. First we must realize that "electricity" does not exist. There is no single thing named "electricity." We must accept the fact that, while several different things do exist inside wires, people wrongly call all of them by a single name.

    So never ask "what is electricity". Instead, discard the word "electricity" and begin using the correct names for all the separate phenomena. Here are a few of them:

    The above questions all have sensible answers. But if you ask what is electricity?, then all of the answers you'll find will just confuse you, and you'll never stop asking that question.


    "I am reminded of the professor, who when asked the question 'What is electricity?' replied 'It all depends what you mean by 'is.'"
    - A. Gilchrist, ASLIB 1972


    Hrm, I find that people think that "electricity" is a single entity (which moves like syrup while it flows along at lightspeed, which is massless yet has mass, which is totally used up by loads while entirely being returned to the power supply. They really believe this! They refuse to accept that "electricity" doesn't exist.)

    OK, how about the following analogy. What is a crane? Simple! A crane is a kind of migratory waterbird which is made of steel truss, lives on diesel fuel, frogs and small fish, is typtically hundreds of feet tall, and is found both in wetlands and city construction sites. Cranes are very simple to understand. If you cannot imagine a 500ft steel waterbird striding across the wetlands while lifting huge i-beams and eating frogs, you must not be very smart. I'm an expert on cranes, so it cannot possibly be my own explanation which is flawed. It must be you who simply cannot grasp these obvious concepts.

    In fact, the above "cranes" do not exist, and neither does "electricity." Both are collections of completely separate concepts, but where we've given them the same name. Construction cranes are not waterbirds, in the same way that flowing energy (watts) is not flowing charge (amperes.) If a flow of electricity is an electric current, then electricity cannot be a form of energy. (Yet everyone wants to believe in giant steel waterbirds, since that was what we were all taught as children. That many books couldn't be wrong! Yet they are. There's actually two separate things flowing along the wires, one moving fast, the other going extremely slow, with both named "electricity." )

    The physicist Richard Feynman has his own take on this. What is Wakalixes? Talk to the experts, read the books, and you'll only become confused. Everyone argues about the true nature of Wakalixes, and experts give contradictory explanations. but they adamantly refuse to agree upon a simple definition of the word, and Wakalixes lacks any narrow scientific definition. (Feynman was complaining about K6 textbooks' idiotic use of the word "energy," but his reasoning equally applies to their crazy, impossible explanations of "electricity." The crane is a simple beast, made of steel, yet covered in feathers...)

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ads:


    SCIENTISTS' DEFINTION OF ELECTRICITY

    ELECTRICITY IS NOT ENERGY

    HOW SHOULD WE TEACH ELECTRICITY?

    WHAT IS ELECTRICITY, REALLY?

    MORE ABOUT "ELECTRICITY" 30 misconceptions that screwed *me* up.

    ELECTRICITY DOES NOT EXIST

    ELECTRICITY IS NOT ENERGY

    ELECTRICITY Q & A

    ISN'T THIS JUST NITPICKING?!

    MORE ELECTRICAL ARTICLES HERE

    
    
    
    

    LINKS


    (Note the many contradictory definitions found on other sites.
    They all give answers, but they don't agree among themselves!)


    This is part of Bill B's SCIENCE HOBBYIST website.
     
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    http://amasci.com/miscon/whatis.html
    Electrica Technology Inc. and Linkedin
    Created and maintained by Bill Beaty. Mail me at: .
    View My Stats