It's Only a Game By: Gary Adornato 1/13/02 It's only a game. There are statements that have been repeated so many times, that they become accepted as if they were truths. This one, for instance... the simple way to negate any conversation about the multi-billion dollar industry that is sports in America. It's only a game, and so, all things are possible. The rules that govern society and maintain structure in our world are magically suspended. Laws are ignored on every level, ethics are changed to fit the need of the moment. It is, after all, only a game... But the winds are beginning to change. There's a growing awareness that these things that we call games are somewhat more than even businesses... something more, not less, than the mundane trading of dollars for stuff and nonsense. Sports teams are changing whole cities, rearranging their economies and priorities in the name of luxury suites and concession rights. Billions of dollars are shifting places, moving up the ladder from we, the fans, to vendors, to franchises, to players and owners and back again... creating whole industries, spawning styles and even driving some of the media that informs our lives. Just a game? Sports is the most dynamic and public of businesses, a significant portion of our awareness in the day of many of our lives. And always, sports stands as a metaphor. It always has, though we've tried hard at times to deny its place... Heroism and the overcoming of adversity. The value and rightness of diversity, of inclusion. The nobility of a common cause. We are raised with the storybook of sports prominent in the libraries of our minds, and its pages are well worn. But always, the uneasiness in calling that part of our lives, the manufactured experiences of our exposure to sports, a critical reality. After all, the voices call, it's only a game. Perhaps it is only a game. Perhaps the grown children in same-colored clothes that compete on the fields and courts of the country are really, truly just playing. But we, the tens of millions of fans across the country, we pay to watch them play. We buy the papers that report on their games. We huddle with our friends and families in front of screens large and small, and for those few hours we go there, we play, too. And later, we drink the beer and soda that they said we should. We wear their sneakers, their jerseys, their hats. And in the name of our playmates, we create a small identity among the many that we carry, a choice of allegiance that we label... Fan. Our willingness to identify with our sports, our teams, our players is the essential bond that makes the billions upon billions of dollars flow smoothly. Tens if not hundreds of thousands of jobs, from ticket takers to t-shirt makers, from barkeeps to hacks, from athletes to carparks have we Fans' money in their paychecks. The agreement to be a part, this identity of Fan, is the river of money that turns the wheel and makes the bread for the table of Sports. That willingness is based on faith, a trust that the possibilities for every play, for every game and for every season are infinite and unknown, subject only to the performance of our players in our arenas. It is the critical legacy of the Keepers of our Sports that this trust be kept, this faith be justified above all else. And now, in the NBA, there is a breach, a failure that could ultimately break some of those bonds. It is in the system of refereeing, the guardianship of the players and the game, that the NBA has chosen to play its own games, and it's about to be caught. We Fans always knew, or thought that we did. We watched Monroe spin with the ball on his hip, and we smiled knowingly. We watched Magic take the extra step, Bird push off to clear his jumper, and we knew that they were breaking the rules, that the Star System was in place... but it was a subtle thing, and reserved for a precious few whose consistent excellence gave them rank and privilege. It wasn't right, but we allowed it as a form of honor. In the beginning, we were innocent, and we opened a very ugly door. The last generation of basketball players has done what is always done to inconsistency - they've exploited it, abused it and turned it into something obscene. As the eighties turned to nineties, and the league became more dependent on television riches to survive and to expand, what had been a flirtatious tease became raw pornography. Players began to see special treatment as a birthright, and referees more as hall monitors than policemen. And, since it was clear that the referees were using their own discretion, rather than a fixed measuring stick, the game gradually became one of how far, how much, and how often the rules could be bent, mangled and broken. Player/referee arguments became commonplace, even expected, as players lobbied brazenly for their own advantage. Flopping, that pathetic display of manipulation, became not only accepted, but taught out of the perceived necessity to level the playing field. The cheating became the norm, and the league, faced with a choice of tightening up or continuing the slide, greased the ramp and tossed in a few ball bearings on for good measure. The terrible shame of it was that at the time that the Keepers of the Game chose to cheapen it, the players of the game were reaching incredible heights. A combination of extraordinary athleticism, an opening of the game to the world, and the growing financial opportunity drawing the best athletes away from other sports gave the NBA an embarrassment of riches, a cornucopia that continues to spill out today. Other generations of hoopsters were wonderful for their times, but few realists could possibly deny that the physical talents and abilities of this generation of players radically exceeds anything seen, or even imagined before. The raw product of the NBA - it's incredible ballet of giants performed in mid-air and blinding speeds - is dynamic, powerful and damn fine entertainment. So, the NBA comes to this - a brilliant product being dominated by the league through its referees, who choose without apparent reason or logic who, and when, to favor with critical privileges. It is the referees that too often determine the outcome of close and important games; it is the referees that create allowances and exceptions that allow some players, and some teams, to flourish. There are systemic issues that cause some of the abnormalities, but those are in place by the league's dictate and desire, so those systems become part of the conscious decision of the league. And because the bestowing of favor so creates advantage for some, it is the league that is determining the outcome of some of the contests, some of the time, rather than the athletes... and that, the removal of self-determination from our teams, makes basketball less than "a game"... it makes it a sham. The choice to bastardize this game is made not by the Fans who pay for it, and not truly by the athletes that play it. It's not made by the media that glorifies it, and it's not even made by the Owners that steward it. It is made in private, by Commissioner Stern and a chosen few, who have created a system of refereeing that is to the rest of the world as the FBI was to America in Hoover's time - powerful and covert, unaccountable to anyone but imbued with the authority to punish those that question its motives and practices. Through its machinations, the referee system has made it clear that part of the ownership of the game of basketball - its integrity, its ethics, its legacy - is tightly held by Stern, and shared by Stern with only whom he chooses. And as a government can influence an economy to the point of controlling it, so Stern influences the direction of the game of basketball, using the referees and their choices to push and tug the game to the place of his choosing. It is a game, but it's not only a game. It is an industry that operates through, and with, a public trust. It is a sport that is frequently marketed as having a leadership role in our communities, and whose athletes are icons for much of our generations. Commissioner Stern has been righteous about the impact of some athletes in their choice of what songs to sing, and finicky about the length of their shorts. He lashes out at those that call into question what is reasonably challenged, and he shuts the door to that system when those that pay his wages ask to be involved. Stern is playing the hypocrite for overseeing a system that cheats even as he punishes people and teams for not following the rules... and the ultimate price may well be the integrity and popularity of the game, and the willingness of Fans to support it in the future.